The WikiLeaks affair – with or without its hypothesised connections to the Anonymous collective and the Arab Spring – has had massive ruptural effects on aspects of the global political system. This article focuses on the academic reinscription of the WikiLeaks affair, focusing on the different receptions received within different literatures and fields. This article and the special section as a whole begin such an enterprise. ![]() The theoretical questions posed by this material reality need to be asked and responded to. Despite common demands to support either transparency or secrecy in political and moral terms, we live with the tension between these terms and its inherent contradictions daily. We need to find different ways of staying with the aporia of transparency-as-secrecy and secrecy-as- transparency. ![]() ![]() After providing a historical account of transparency in public and political life, this article therefore makes the case for working with the tension between these terms rather than responding to the dyad as a choice. But the moral discourse that condemns secrecy and rewards transparency may cause us to misread the symbiotic relationship between these terms. The rise of transparency as a political and cultural ideal has left secrecy to accumulate negative connotations. ![]() This article opens a special section on the politics of opacity and openness.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |